• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electrical Engineering News and Products

Electronics Engineering Resources, Articles, Forums, Tear Down Videos and Technical Electronics How-To's

  • Products / Components
    • Analog ICs
    • Connectors
    • Microcontrollers
    • Power Electronics
    • Sensors
    • Test and Measurement
    • Wire / Cable
  • Applications
    • Automotive/Transportation
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Medical
    • Telecommunications
    • Wearables
    • Wireless
  • Resources
    • DesignFast
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Week
    • Oscilloscope Product Finder
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
    • Women in Engineering
  • Videos
    • Teschler’s Teardown Videos
    • EE Videos and Interviews
  • Learning Center
    • EE Classrooms
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
    • FAQs
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • 5G

Choosing inductors or ferrite beads for power supply filtering

April 19, 2016 By Chris Francis Leave a Comment

I recently came across an interesting article by Analog Devices in their February “Analog Dialogue” called “Ferrite Beads Demystified”. It was interesting beyond its analysis of ferrite beads because it covered one of the issues I have seen in the past with regards to power supply filtering — that of resonance between a power supply capacitor and a filtering inductor. I haven’t seen it discussed elsewhere although I am sure there must be other references to the problem. The problem you might face is that you want to clean up a switching regulator output going to other circuitry or reduce interference from a switching regulator going back into a power source or wiring (for EMC reasons). Simply adding some inductance seems like a good idea but it isn’t that straightforward. For example, consider a 1uH inductor with an 80MHz SRF (self-resonant frequency). This could typically be modeled as shown below.

Image1

A ferrite bead would be similar in characteristics and the impedance of the inductor/ferrite bead would be:

Image2

That all looks fine and would work well with a resistive load, but when you put it in series with a real circuit with some load capacitance, such as 10nF with 0.3 ohms ESR (equivalent series resistance) the problems start to show.

Image3

Now if you look at VOUT in an AC analysis you see this:

Image4

So, while you have good attenuation around 80MHz due to the inductor/ferrite bead, you now have a peak at 1.6MHz due to the resonant circuit created by the 1uH and 10nF. The response to a step input also shows the problem.

Image5

As your switching regulator is likely to be working at a lot lower frequency than 80MHz (although harmonics of the switching frequency may be important for EMC) you could be making your power supply quality considerably worse by adding the filtering. Also, the unstable transient response will most definitely not be what you were wanting.

Three methods of fixing the problem are suggested in the Analog Dialogue although the first – adding a series resistance to the decoupling capacitor – is not very realistic. If the capacitor is on the output of a switching regulator then it will actually consist of the sum of any decoupling capacitors in your circuit. If it is on the input to the switching regulator (where the ferrite bead could be used to prevent EMC issues back down the power source) then the switching regulator will most likely want a good quality decoupling capacitor – probably 10uF or more.

You could increase the inductance or capacitance but that will only move the problem around and not fix it. Adding a damping resistor across the inductor does reduce the peak, at the expense of the higher frequency attenuation. Quite a low value resistor is needed. This shows a comparison with 5 ohms in parallel with the inductor (green trace).

Image6

The peak at 1.6MHz has been reduced considerably but at the expense of the higher frequency attenuation. In fact, the result is almost the same as simply using the resistor and no inductor. The benefit would be the voltage drop across the resistor would be a lot higher if the inductor was not present even though the attenuation is virtually the same. The value required to damp the resonance will depend on the output capacitor value and inductance.

Another option is a damping network consisting of another capacitor and resistor.

Image7

1uF has been added with 5 ohms of series resistance. The effect is shown below – green trace.

Image8

As you can see, the peaking has been removed and the high-frequency attenuation preserved. The resulting transient response is a well-damped transition, as would be expected from a clean looking AC response. The method you might use would depend on several factors:

  • the frequencies you are trying to attenuate
  • value of capacitance which are already present in your design
  • the amount of voltage drop you can tolerate
  • const constraints

The cost constraints can be important. If you have a large capacitance on the filter output anyway then the damping capacitor required will be even larger and so could start to get expensive and take up valuable space. A damping resistor will always be a cheaper option provided you can accept the lower high-frequency attenuation.

If you can tolerate a voltage drop then simply consider a small resistor instead of an inductor. I have found a resistor of 5 or 10‎Ωs can be quite effective at reducing noise in power supplies for analog circuits when you have large capacitance anyway and the cost is minimal and with none of the resonance drawbacks caused by inductors. You will only get a level of attenuation based on 5 or 10‎Ω compared to a ferrite bead or inductor where the impedance for attenuation purposes can be 1k‎Ω or more.

 

You may also like:

  • EMI
    What is EMI and how can you prevent it?

  • EMI control for power and signal lines

  • Comparing magnetic cores for power inductors

  • Traps to avoid when spec’ing a custom transformer
  • parasitic capacitance
    Parasitic capacitance, inductance, and displacement current
DesignFast Banner version: 03e1dd97

Filed Under: FAQ, Featured, Industry Experts Tagged With: analogdevicesinc, basics, FAQ

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

EE Training Center Classrooms

EE Classrooms

Featured Resources

  • EE World Online Learning Center
  • CUI Devices – CUI Insights Blog
  • EE Classroom: Power Delivery
  • EE Classroom: Building Automation
  • EE Classroom: Aerospace & Defense
  • EE Classroom: Grid Infrastructure
Search Millions of Parts from Thousands of Suppliers.

Search Now!
design fast globle

R&D World Podcasts

R&D 100 Episode 7
See More >

Current Digital Issue

April 2022 Special Edition: Internet of Things Handbook

How to turn off a smart meter the hard way Potential cyber attacks have a lot of people worried thanks to the recent conflict in Ukraine. So it might be appropriate to review what happened when cybersecurity fi rm FireEye’s Mandiant team demonstrated how to infiltrate the network of a North American utility. During this…

Digital Edition Back Issues

Sponsored Content

Positioning in 5G NR – A look at the technology and related test aspects

Radar, NFC, UV Sensors, and Weather Kits are Some of the New RAKwireless Products for IoT

5G Connectors: Enabling the global 5G vision

Control EMI with I-PEX ZenShield™ Connectors

Speed-up time-to-tapeout with the Aprisa digital place-and-route system and Solido Characterization Suite

Siemens Analogue IC Design Simulation Flow

More Sponsored Content >>

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • What is the function of the long stub?
  • Altium Routing: through vias being split into two blind vias. Additional question about blind via costs / benifits
  • Why is Analog Design so Hard????
  • UCC28070A controller ramp circuit implemented incorrectly?
  • DIY Oscilloscope

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Background of Members Here
  • Cannot see how to open a Mini DIN connector
  • UCC28070A ramp circuit is wrong?
  • Tricky Triacs
  • software PWM

Oscilloscopes Product Finder

Footer

EE World Online

EE WORLD ONLINE NETWORK

  • 5G Technology World
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer's Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire & Cable Tips

EE WORLD ONLINE

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Lee's teardown videos
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About Us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookConnect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube Add us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy