• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electrical Engineering News and Products

Electronics Engineering Resources, Articles, Forums, Tear Down Videos and Technical Electronics How-To's

  • Products / Components
    • Analog ICs
    • Connectors
    • Microcontrollers
    • Power Electronics
    • Sensors
    • Test and Measurement
    • Wire / Cable
  • Applications
    • Automotive/Transportation
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Medical
    • Telecommunications
    • Wearables
    • Wireless
  • Resources
    • DesignFast
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Week
    • Oscilloscope Product Finder
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
    • Women in Engineering
  • Videos
    • Teschler’s Teardown Videos
    • EE Videos and Interviews
  • Learning Center
    • EE Classrooms
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
    • FAQs
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • 5G

Electronic engines valves: an idea whose time has come … and gone?, Part 3: The electronic camless approach

September 9, 2021 By Bill Schweber Leave a Comment

The electronically controlled, cam-free internal combustion engine seemed like a good idea, but technical and market realities stifled its acceptance.

The previous parts of this article discussed the operation of the standard, cam-driven internal combustion engine with a mechanically driven intake and exhaust valve pair for each cylinder. This section looks at the alternative of an electronically controlled camless system.

For many years, automotive engineers have known that if they could implement more control and adjustability over valve timing, they could boost engine output power and reduce pollutants in the engine exhaust. This approach begins with a smart timing system, which involves an engine-crankshaft angle sensor to provide an input signal and a processor for executing algorithms and then drives electronically controlled valves. This combination would be a natural fit for engineers to design in as part of engine control as implemented in the engine control unit (ECU).

Three critical elements are needed to make this happen, in adding to the crankshaft angle sensor (which is now standard in nearly all vehicles: enhancements to the ECU algorithms, power-management ICs to drive the electronic valves, and the electronic valve actuators themselves. The goal is a flexible valve-control system that improves performance while reducing emissions. Sometimes called a “camless” system, this control allows engine control subsystems to vary valve timing, valve lift, and compression ratio in response to engine load, temperature, fuel/air mix, and other factors. The timing could be continuously adjusted to dynamically balance engine performance with respect to parameters such as power, emissions, and fuel efficiency, depending on the immediate priority.

Further, with electronically controlled camless valves, the timing and operation of each valve is independent of the others, which offers significant operational flexibility. For example, if the engine’s load is light, it even allows the control module to deactivate cylinders to save fuel. Such a system could even compensate for component wear over time and engine life.

Not easy to implement

Conceptually, it is architecturally uncomplicated to replace a mechanical valve train with a processor-based one. In practice, though, major obstacles hinder successful implementation, in addition to the long and established track record of (and comfort with) the existing approach. It’s easy to think, “What’s the big deal naively? Just use the digital output of a processor to drive an actuator which controls its respective valve,” but there are major limitations, standards, and long-term issues that automotive engineers face.

There are two approaches available to actuate a valve electronically. The first uses a solenoid, a reliable and well-understood transducer for converting an applied current into linear motion and static force. However, challenges exist if you use a solenoid as an actuator under the hood (Figure 1).

Fig 1: A single-ended solenoid arrangement (powered by an electromagnet) is one way to control the valves. (Image: Clemson University)

First, the current pulse needed to activate the solenoid with the force and speed required in this application is large and difficult to get from the 12 V supply of the vehicle without heavy supply cables. For this reason, the solenoid approach must wait until vehicles switch from 12 V supplies to the more-efficient 42 V standard that automakers are already phasing in over the next few years.

A hefty MOSFET or similar electronic switch is also needed to handle the current for each solenoid, with an intervening driver to interface between the relatively modest digital output drive of the valve-timing processor to the MOSFET, which drives the solenoid as actuator. Although this solenoid operates at a moderate duty cycle, its overall rate of operation is high enough that there are self-heating problems. Further, the heat under the hood, especially high near the engine, aggravates these problems. The number of lifetime solenoid cycles is in the millions, and the combination of heat and operating cycles brings major reliability concerns.

Solenoids alone can actuate in either direction when the power supply to them is reversed. But this is complicated to do in a single-supply, grounded environment, such as a car or truck. It is more practical to use a spring to develop the return force. The solenoid then has to open the normally closed valve by overcoming the spring’s force. A solenoid can be designed with a pair of springs in which the applied force overcomes the return spring force while a helper spring pushes the solenoid in the actuate direction and reduces the needed holding current. Other approaches use a pair of solenoids in a push-pull arrangement, with one to close and the other to open the valve (Figure 2 and Figure 3). However, all of these factors add complexity and cost to the design.

Fig 2: A more-advanced approach uses a pair of opposed solenoids for better valve control, shown here for the valve-closed position. (Image: Clemson University)
Fig 3: The same two-solenoid arrangement; here for the valve-open position. (Image: Clemson University)

Also, solenoids are on/off actuators with relatively fixed force-versus-distance characteristics. Without springs or other external forces, the solenoid’s force is initially lowest as the magnetic field pulls the core slug toward its center; the force is greatest at the center at the final resting point of the actuator travel.

Consequently, a solenoid slams the valve closed fairly hard, which aggravates wear on the valve seals unless a damping mechanism is added, such as springs or other components. (Recall that the mechanical cam-based valve train solves this distance/force problem by carefully shaping the profile of the cam lobes.) One approach is to build a closed-loop solenoid with a sensor that monitors the core’s position and use this information to modulate the drive current. But this approach also adds complexity and cost to the design.

An alternative to the solenoid is the hydraulically actuated valve mechanism. In this design, pioneered by Sturman Industries (Colorado), now owned by Virtual Energy, a small and fast-acting electrohydraulic actuator provides the “muscle” for valve motion under the control of an electronically controlled digital valve (Figure 4).

Fig 4: The electrohydraulic valve control from Sturman Industries (now Virtual Energy) is a possible alternative to the solenoid-driven valve control. (Image: Virtual Energy)

The fluid power travels via the fuel-injection system and pump. This digital valve uses residual magnetism (the magnetic field that remains after you magnetize an object) to hold the valve open without any applied current after the current pulse moves the valve. (In addition to Sturman, there are efforts underway by UK-based Camcon Automotive Ltd and Sweden-based FreeValve, a subsidiary of Koenigsegg Automotive.)

Engineers developed this type of valve during the Apollo space program, and Sturman modified it for engine control. According to Sturman, the valve offers much more pressure combined with precise position control because the hydraulic valve is a linear transducer. The current flows through two small coils on either side of a small spool that controls fluid flow rather than through a large solenoid; as a result, the system-response time is about five times faster with the coil-based design than with the solenoid-based configuration. The processor can modulate the spool motion – and thus fluid flow and power-to yield the desired force and distance profile.

The final section of this article looks at the status and acceptance outlook for electronically controlled, camless engine valves.

Related EE World Content

Understanding stop/start automobile-engine design, Part 6: Responses and workarounds (has links to previous Parts 1 through 5)
Digital Valves Open Up New Possibilities For Engines
Single element, tooth-detecting speed sensor IC

References

  • Car and Driver, “Variable Valve Timing Explained: An Appreciation of How Quickly Engines Operate”
  • New Atlas, “World’s first fully digital valves open up engine possibilities”
  • Motor Authority, “Fully digital valves could change the future of the combustion engine”
  • Motor Authority, “ ‘Engineering Explained’ tackles Koenigseggs camless engine”
  • Clemson University, “Electronic Valve Timing Control”
  • Clemson University, “Camless Engines”
  • Motor1, “Fully Digital Valves Could Massively Improve The ICE”
  • Wikipedia, “Camless Piston Engine”
  • Top Gear, “Here’s how the Koenigsegg Gemera’s 600bhp camless engine works”
  • Hackaday, “Where Are All The Camless Engines?”
  • The Wall Street Journal, “Gas Engines, and the People Behind Them, Are Cast Aside for Electric Vehicles”
  • Wikipedia, “Desmodromic valve”
  • Virtual Energy, “Camless Hydraulic Valve Actuation (HVA)”
  • Machine Design, “Improving Car Engines with Advanced Variable Hydraulic Valves”
  • Skill-Lync, “Design and MBD Simulation of IC Engine Valve Train and FEA Analysis of Rocker Arm”
  • University of Waterloo, “New Fully Flexible Variable Valve Actuation System”
  • University of Waterloo, “New Fully Flexible Variable Valve Actuation System”
  • University of Waterloo, “Hydraulic Variable Valve Actuation System: Development & Validation”

You may also like:

  • electronic combustion engine
    Electronic engines valves: an idea whose time has come…and gone?,…

  • Electronic engines valves: an idea whose time has come ……

  • Electronic engines valves: an idea whose time has come ……

  • Understanding stop/start automobile-engine design, Part 1: The idea
DesignFast Banner version: a237563e

Filed Under: Applications, Automotive/Transportation, FAQ, Featured Tagged With: FAQ

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

EE Training Center Classrooms

EE Classrooms

Featured Resources

  • EE World Online Learning Center
  • CUI Devices – CUI Insights Blog
  • EE Classroom: Power Delivery
  • EE Classroom: Building Automation
  • EE Classroom: Aerospace & Defense
  • EE Classroom: Grid Infrastructure
Search Millions of Parts from Thousands of Suppliers.

Search Now!
design fast globle

R&D World Podcasts

R&D 100 Episode 7
See More >

Current Digital Issue

Our second 5G Handbook is now available

Featuring 15 articles, the 2022 5G Handbook looks at private networks, timing, connectivity, latency, mmWaves, test, and other topics.

Digital Edition Back Issues

Sponsored Content

Positioning in 5G NR – A look at the technology and related test aspects

Radar, NFC, UV Sensors, and Weather Kits are Some of the New RAKwireless Products for IoT

5G Connectors: Enabling the global 5G vision

Control EMI with I-PEX ZenShield™ Connectors

Speed-up time-to-tapeout with the Aprisa digital place-and-route system and Solido Characterization Suite

Siemens Analogue IC Design Simulation Flow

More Sponsored Content >>

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • MAX2771 digital output processing
  • request for a good manual on rectangular waveguide feeding network
  • RC Extraction with black box option
  • what is internal pin in a standard cell
  • MOSFET ORing circuit simulation (LTspice)

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Multistage BJT amplifier
  • Help me to start 24V BLDC (Star winding)
  • Background of Members Here
  • Leak detection...
  • software PWM

Oscilloscopes Product Finder

Footer

EE World Online

EE WORLD ONLINE NETWORK

  • 5G Technology World
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer's Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire & Cable Tips

EE WORLD ONLINE

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Lee's teardown videos
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About Us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookConnect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube Add us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy