• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electrical Engineering News and Products

Electronics Engineering Resources, Articles, Forums, Tear Down Videos and Technical Electronics How-To's

  • Products / Components
    • Analog ICs
    • Connectors
    • Microcontrollers
    • Power Electronics
    • Sensors
    • Test and Measurement
    • Wire / Cable
  • Applications
    • Automotive/Transportation
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Medical
    • Telecommunications
    • Wearables
    • Wireless
  • Resources
    • DesignFast
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Week
    • Oscilloscope Product Finder
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
    • Women in Engineering
  • Videos
    • Teschler’s Teardown Videos
    • EE Videos and Interviews
  • Learning Center
    • EE Classrooms
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
    • FAQs
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • 5G

Hey, engineers: be grateful you are not epidemiologists! (Part 2: Engineering R&D)

October 3, 2020 By Bill Schweber

Part 1 of this article looked at the challenges and unavoidable uncertainties facing so much of medical research, and why all-important replication of experiments is so difficult to accomplish. This part looks at the corresponding situation for engineering research and product assessment.

After thinking about the medical-research situation, I compared the issues to those related to the many tests which scientists and engineers perform on their research, innovations, and products at all stages ranging from the R&D phase through prototype, production, and even formal release. Let’s be honest: it’s far, far easier, and more reliable to run an array of tests to evaluate a new device or product than to do the equivalent in medical research. Think about it:

  • you know quite a lot about the unit under test: how it was made, the performance of its constituent elements, and how it was assembled; its “provenance” is reasonably clear. That’s quite different from having a fuzzy medical history. Yes, there are cases where a subtle change in how a component was made affects the unit-to-unit results, but that’s not the general case.
  • you don’t have to worry about the subject not following the planned research protocol, skipping medications, having pre-existing conditions, eating/not eating as directed by the protocol, not fully reporting on activities for whatever reason), and so on;
  • you can perform fairly detailed tests on a single unit and get meaningful results; you can also build up a pilot run of identical units to collect data which help take tolerances and variances into account;
  • you can model the unit before and after tests to varying degrees of fidelity depending on how much time and effort you want to invest. Even if the model is not perfect – and they never are – it still is usually fairly good and can be made better as more data is collected;
  • even when the tests are sophisticated and there is a legitimate possibility of errors due to the concept, set-up, or execution, there usually are ways to cross-check the results and get some level of confidence in the credibility of the results;
  • while it is the usual case for other engineering researchers to try to replicate your efforts in many cases, it can be done and is done in special ones. For example, soon after Theodore H. Maiman at Hughes Research Laboratories demonstrated the first ruby laser at a press conference (coinciding with his very basic one-page paper in the “letters” section of Nature “Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby”), researchers at other institutions repeated his work and confirmed it was not a mistake or misleading “light show.” Furthermore, even when others do not confirm the work directly, they build on it and extend it as they advance the technology. By doing so, those subsequent researchers do confirm the original work.
  • Finally, most changes in science and engineering tests are generally reversible, which provides another tool for confirming a hypothesis and results. In contrast, it’s very hard to do that with medical research, as you often can’t undo the effects of specific actions (“so it wasn’t the kidney, after all, we’ll just put it back”). Even if you stop giving a certain medicine to attempt to return to the baseline, its effects may often linger or have done irrevocable damage. An option may be double-blind tests, but they are hard to set up, time-consuming, costly, and still have issues between test and control groups.

Stepping back and thinking about the bigger picture, you have to admit to the reality: implementing engineering and science tests, gathering reliable data, evaluating that collected data, and extrapolating it to meaningful conclusions with a high level of confidence is much, much easier than doing many types of medical research.

Many years ago, I was in an informal, spirited debate with another engineer. He maintained it was as hard to be a good engineer as it was to be a good doctor and that the requirements for both were equally difficult. I only partially agreed. Sure, there’s a lot to know for both, but the engineering profession generally doesn’t have an equivalent to the structured residency cycle, and instigating changes is easier and less risky. While engineering mistakes at the prototype bench may kill a circuit board (a proxy for the patient), that’s very different than an incorrect medical diagnosis and subsequent action.

I maintained at the time that many of the ambiguities and risks in medical research are absent in much of the engineering equivalent and would actually be at odds with the kind of certainty on which engineers thrive. The Covid-19 virus, its data, and the related challenges have made me even more certain of that view.

You may also like:

  • epidemiologists
    Hey, engineers: be grateful you are not epidemiologists! (Part 1:…
DesignFast Banner version: 641873d7

Filed Under: Covid-19, Featured Tagged With: covidengineering

Primary Sidebar

EE Training Center Classrooms

EE Classrooms

Featured Resources

  • EE World Online Learning Center
  • CUI Devices – CUI Insights Blog
  • EE Classroom: Power Delivery
  • EE Classroom: Building Automation
  • EE Classroom: Aerospace & Defense
  • EE Classroom: Grid Infrastructure
Search Millions of Parts from Thousands of Suppliers.

Search Now!
design fast globle

R&D World Podcasts

R&D 100 Episode 7
See More >

Current Digital Issue

April 2022 Special Edition: Internet of Things Handbook

How to turn off a smart meter the hard way Potential cyber attacks have a lot of people worried thanks to the recent conflict in Ukraine. So it might be appropriate to review what happened when cybersecurity fi rm FireEye’s Mandiant team demonstrated how to infiltrate the network of a North American utility. During this…

Digital Edition Back Issues

Sponsored Content

Positioning in 5G NR – A look at the technology and related test aspects

Radar, NFC, UV Sensors, and Weather Kits are Some of the New RAKwireless Products for IoT

5G Connectors: Enabling the global 5G vision

Control EMI with I-PEX ZenShield™ Connectors

Speed-up time-to-tapeout with the Aprisa digital place-and-route system and Solido Characterization Suite

Siemens Analogue IC Design Simulation Flow

More Sponsored Content >>

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Help with Verilog replicate operator
  • ESP Serial Communication Problem with RS232
  • How to mark layer comments in CAP of spef file using StarRC
  • MAX5389 resetting by noise
  • Simulation of resonator in HFSS

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Will Header and socket hold this PCB OK?
  • Relaxation oscillator with neon or...
  • software PWM
  • MPlab8 remove page breaks in list file
  • ATOM Diy module

Oscilloscopes Product Finder

Footer

EE World Online

EE WORLD ONLINE NETWORK

  • 5G Technology World
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer's Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire & Cable Tips

EE WORLD ONLINE

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Lee's teardown videos
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About Us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookConnect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube Add us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy