Here is what the architecture of modern-day dual-speed Ethernet/Wi-Fi router looks like these days.
TP-Link’s Archer C7 dual-speed wireless router delivers 1,300 Mbps over the 5 GHz band and 450 Mbps over the 2.4 GHz band. That should be enough bandwidth for HD streaming, online gaming and other bandwidth-intensive tasks. The idea behind using two bands is to handle simple tasks like web browsing on 2.4 GHz and bandwidth-intensive operations on 5 GHz. Both bands are operational simultaneously. This wireless router also has a 1 Gb WAN port and four 1 Gb LAN ports.
Most wireless routers made today are built around three main chips and the TP-Link router is no exception. It uses a chipset from Qualcomm. The main device is a QCA9558 dual-band three-stream 802.11n system on a chip. It contains both the radio circuits for 2.4 GHz band and the baseband circuitry for managing Ethernet connections. Also on the main board is a Qualcomm AR8327 seven-port gigabit ethernet switch.
Thus the main 802.11 chip on the motherboard handles 802.11n transmissions taking place at 2.4 GHz. The main difference between 802.11n and earlier versions of 802.11 is that the ‘n’ spec added provisions for multiple-in-multiple-out antennas or MIMO antennas. This spec has been around since about 2007.
The 5 GHz band is what’s called 802.11ac. That version of the spec came along around 2013. Also, 802.11ac signals have different qualities than those following 802.11n. Those differences include wider channels (80 or 160 MHz versus 40 MHz), more spatial streams (up to eight versus four), use of higher-order modulation (up to 256-QAM vs. 64-QAM), and the addition of Multi-user MIMO, though the TP-Link router doesn’t actually support the multi-user style of MIMO.
Another interesting point is that this three-chip architecture is the same one you’ll see used on other wireless routers, even those that use a chipset from some other supplier. That seems to be because the 802.11 chip makers put out reference designs for use with their 802.11 chips that are the basis for most commercial wireless router boxes. The use of these reference designs leads to a lot of commonality among different brands of wireless router hardware.
For one example, on the TP-Link motherboard you’ll find base-T dual port transformers from Mentech and a network transformer from Group-Tek, as well as two 16-bit DDR2 synchronous DRAM chips from Winbond. We’ve seen these same devices on motherboards from other wireless router makers. The similarities are such that these devices even occupy spots on the circuit board that don’t vary much from one wireless manufacturer to another.
There’s another similarity among different 802.11 chip makers: Most don’t release much information about their chips. For example, you can’t find data sheets for the two Qualcomm 802.11 chips online. On another wireless router we’ve examined, the router manufacturer put adhesive foam pads over the three main chips. Pulling off the adhesive also removed the markings on those chips. Apparently, the adhesive was there to make it almost impossible to read the chip markings. It didn’t seem to serve any other function other than to complicate the teardown process.
There are a couple other observations we can make about T-Link’s board. We note that the 802.11 chip for the 5 GHz band sits on its own mezzanine-style board, along with three RF amps from Skyworks. There doesn’t seem to be any technical reason to put this chip on its own little board. The backside of the board is basically empty, so it wasn’t done for purposes of board density. Our guess is that this T-Link router design originally handled just the 2.4 GHz 802.11 band and the 5 GHz facilities were added. We’d also suspect that later versions of this wireless router integrate the 5 GHz chip onto the main circuit board.
The final aspect of the router we’ll comment on is the antenna and RF signal handling system we found. There are fine wires, apparently 16 awg, running between the antennas and the RF front end on the router. At first, we thought these might be bare wires, which would be odd for handling signals in the single-digit gigahertz range. But a close inspection of the wires reveals they are actually very fine coax cable which makes more sense.
The signal-handling path from the end of the cable to the 802.11 chips is also interesting. The cables for the 2.4 GHz signals are soldered directly to the circuit board. A close-up look at the board shows the shield soldering and fine soldering of the center conductor a few millimeters beyond.
We can also make out a few other features of the signal path from the antenna connection to the 802.11 chip. The three components located there form a pi network for matching the impedance of the antenna to that of the RF input. Next comes a solid-state switch IC that switches the antenna connection between the RF receiver input and the transmitter output, so the 802.11 radio can transmit and receive on the same antenna.
In one path after the switch, we find what we speculate may be a diode network there to make sure large input signals don’t overload the front end of the RF receiver. On the other signal path, we find a chip that may be an RF amp, there to boost the RF output sent to the antenna. These circuits are identical on each of the three paths for the 2.5 GHz antennas.
All in all, the reviews we’ve seen of this router give it good marks as a higher-end device without the price tag. It delivers its features using chips from well-known suppliers.