• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electrical Engineering News and Products

Electronics Engineering Resources, Articles, Forums, Tear Down Videos and Technical Electronics How-To's

  • Products / Components
    • Analog ICs
    • Connectors
    • Microcontrollers
    • Power Electronics
    • Sensors
    • Test and Measurement
    • Wire / Cable
  • Applications
    • Automotive/Transportation
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Medical
    • Telecommunications
    • Wearables
    • Wireless
  • Resources
    • DesignFast
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Week
    • Oscilloscope Product Finder
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
    • Women in Engineering
  • Videos
    • Teschler’s Teardown Videos
    • EE Videos and Interviews
  • Learning Center
    • EE Classrooms
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
    • FAQs
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • 5G

The proving ring – An alternative to dead-weight calibration, Part 2

January 9, 2020 By Bill Schweber

The proving ring implements a simple principle of physics to provide precise and tangible indication of applied weight ranging up to hundreds of thousands of pounds

Part 1 of this article looked at the basic problem of calibrating sensor-based data acquisition and especially the problem of calibration of weight and force. This part looks at the factors which inspired the proving ring along with its present-day use.

Fig 1: S. N. Petrenko, an engineer at the National Bureau of Standards (along with section head H. L. Whittemore) developed the proving ring in order to precisely calibrate the applied force in the Brinell hardness test. (Image: NBS/NIST)

As with so many technological advances, the developers of the proving ring did not start with the goal of developing a replacement for deadweight calibration. Herbert Lucius Whittemore, head of the NBS Engineering Mechanics Section, and Serge Nicolas Petrenko, an engineer in the section, were trying to resolve inconsistencies in the results of the Brinell hardness test, where a pressure gauge pushes a plunger with a ball tip at a known force into the sample under test. The diameter of the resultant indentation, which is much easier to measure accurately than its depth, is a quantitative indication of the sample’s hardness.

Whittemore and Petrenko found that their Brinell results were inconsistent, largely due to problems with the accuracy of pressure gauge and hydraulic pump used to impress the plunger. Using deadweights gave much better results but was impractical, especially at non-NBS locations. They came up with the idea of adopting the deflection of rings under load (Figure 1) and submitted a patent for their proving ring, number 1648375, to the United States Patent Office on September 14, 1926. It was granted on November 8, 1927.

The principle behind the ring’s deflection is well known to mechanical engineers (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In simplest form, for a thin ring under modest compression (or tension) of load P, the decrease (or increase) in ring diameter is proportional to PD3/EI, where D is the diameter of the ring, E is the modulus of elasticity of the ring’s material, and I is the dependent on the ring’s cross-section.

Thus, for small loads, the deflection is linearly related to the applied load. A more-detailed analysis provides a much more complicated and precise equation which takes into account various second-order factors (Reference 1), but the linear relationship remains valid. Typical deflection of a proving ring under full-scale load is just a few millimeters, and that can be measured with great accuracy and precision using micrometers and other gauges (of course, temperature plays a role in the final accuracy, but that can be controlled or factored into the calibration and compensation (Reference 2).

proving rings
Fig 2: The concept and basic physics of the proving ring are simple. (Image: Slideshare)
Fig 3: The basic elements of the proving ring also show its simplicity in design, although the fabrication has some subtleties for highest accuracy; older proving rings used a mechanical micrometer in place of the LVDT-based extension readout. (Image: Slideplayer)

As with most instrumentation, squeezing that last bit of precision performance requires care in design and fabrication, even if the underlying principle is simple. Construction of a proving ring starts with an annealed, forged ring made of special steel alloys, which is then precision-ground to final size. The threaded attachment bosses which connect to ring to the rest of the system are not welded on, as this would introduce uneven stresses and subsequent errors; instead, they are part of the original forged shape although they complicate the forging. (There are slight differences in the design of these attachment points with proving rings intended for solely for compression use versus those only for tension.)

Since proving rings are operate with relatively small deflection to stay within their linear range, measuring the minuscule deflection of the ring – which is typically between 0.05 (1.25 mm) to 0.10 inch (2.5 mm) under full load for a medium-size unit – requires a unique, non-obvious approach. It is done using a vibrating reed mounted within the ring on a special micrometer screw mechanism and a small button opposite the free end of the reed. The reed is manually or electrically tapped to start it vibrating; as the ring deflects, the micrometer is adjusted until the reed’s tip grazes the button, and so the reed’s sound changes dramatically; then the micrometer position is read. Though this technique may seem almost archaic, it provides repeatable and consistent indications – the hallmarks of good metrology – with accuracy to about 0.00005 inch. Newer proving ring systems also use a carefully positioned video camera and image-measurement software to measure the ring’s deflected size.

Fig 4: Although some proving rings still use the all-mechanical micrometer-based readout of ring extension or compression, many newer ones instead use an LVDT-based digital readout; this can also be retrofitted to older proving rings. (Image: Morehouse Instrument Company, Inc.)

Proving rings do not drift or change with age as long as they are not used beyond their deflection limits, and many have been in use for decades. For highest accuracy, a proving ring needs to be used at a specific temperature, or a correction factor must be applied since all metals have a temperature coefficient of expansion, which affects their size. NIST or in-house deadweights can calibrate a proving ring and then used in the field at other locations, solving the on-site weight/force calibration challenge. Many new proving rings are equipped with electronic LVDTs rather than mechanical micrometers for displacement measurement and digital readouts, and older proving rings can be upgraded to digital readouts (Figure 4).

When used properly, a proving ring provides absolute accuracy of between 0.0125% and 0.075% of reading, according to Morehouse Instrument Company, Inc., the leading supplier of this precise secondary standard. A ring rated for 1000 pounds measures from 6 to 12 inches in diameter, is about 1-inch thick and 2-inches deep, weighs under 10 pounds and sells for under $5000; one with a 300,0000-pound rating is under 20 inches in diameter, weighs only about 150 pounds, and costs about $20,000, all of which are far less than their deadweight equivalents (Figure 5). As an added benefit, multiple smaller proving rings can be used in parallel to reach higher ranges, if needed.

Fig 5: Standard proving rings are available with a wide range of maximum values; they are far smaller and lighter the dead weights they replace. (Image: NIST)

 

Conclusion

Simulation and replication of key physical standards is an ongoing challenge spanning accuracy, precision, dynamic range, and other factors. Innovations such as the proving ring demonstrate, once again, that the impetus for advances in one application – here, the Brinell hardness test – is often the driver for innovation in other areas as well.

EE World References

  • High Capacity Reaction Torquemeters Carry NIST Calibration
  • Load Cell Designed to be Hermetically Encapsulated
  • Subminiature Compression Load Cells Offer Reliability and Space Efficiency
  • Stress & Strain, Part 2: Implications for electronics
  • Stress & Strain, Part 1: Fundamental principles

External References

  1. “Proving Rings for Calibrating Testing Machines,” Bruce R. Wilson, Douglas R. Tate, and George Borkowski, National Bureau of Standards, 1946, page 216
  2. “Temperature Coefficients for Proving Rings,” Bruce R. Wilson, Douglas R. Tate, and George Borkowski, National Bureau of Standards, 1946, page 207
  3. NIST, “Calibration of the Proving Ring”
  4. Morehouse Instrument Company, Inc.
  5. “World in the balance: the historic quest for an absolute system of measurement,” Robert P. Crease, W.W. Norton, 2011.
  6. NIST, S. Patent 1648375
  7. Slideplayer, “Measurement of Force, Torque, and Pressure”
  8. NIST, “The Proving Ring Design”
  9. Hareeshna Gowda, “Unit 6: Force, Pressure, and Torque Measurement”
  10. NIST, “For All Times, For All Peoples: How Replacing the Kilogram Empowers Industry”
  11. NIST, “A Turning Point for Humanity: Redefining the World’s Measurement System”
  12. NIST, “Toward the SI System Based on Fundamental Constants: Weighing the Electron”
  13. NIST, “Universe’s Constants Now Known with Sufficient Certainty to Completely Redefine the International System of Units”

 

You may also like:

  • proving rings
    The proving ring – An alternative to dead-weight calibration, Part…
  • stress & strain
    Stress & Strain, Part 2: Implications for electronics
  • stress and strain
    Stress & Strain, Part 1: Fundamental principles
DesignFast Banner version: 42f9428a

Filed Under: FAQ, Featured, Test and Measurement Tips Tagged With: FAQ

Primary Sidebar

EE Training Center Classrooms

EE Classrooms

Featured Resources

  • EE World Online Learning Center
  • CUI Devices – CUI Insights Blog
  • EE Classroom: Power Delivery
  • EE Classroom: Building Automation
  • EE Classroom: Aerospace & Defense
  • EE Classroom: Grid Infrastructure
Search Millions of Parts from Thousands of Suppliers.

Search Now!
design fast globle

R&D World Podcasts

R&D 100 Episode 7
See More >

Current Digital Issue

Our second 5G Handbook is now available

Featuring 15 articles, the 2022 5G Handbook looks at private networks, timing, connectivity, latency, mmWaves, test, and other topics.

Digital Edition Back Issues

Sponsored Content

Positioning in 5G NR – A look at the technology and related test aspects

Radar, NFC, UV Sensors, and Weather Kits are Some of the New RAKwireless Products for IoT

5G Connectors: Enabling the global 5G vision

Control EMI with I-PEX ZenShield™ Connectors

Speed-up time-to-tapeout with the Aprisa digital place-and-route system and Solido Characterization Suite

Siemens Analogue IC Design Simulation Flow

More Sponsored Content >>

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • MAX2771 digital output processing
  • request for a good manual on rectangular waveguide feeding network
  • RC Extraction with black box option
  • what is internal pin in a standard cell
  • MOSFET ORing circuit simulation (LTspice)

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Multistage BJT amplifier
  • Help me to start 24V BLDC (Star winding)
  • Background of Members Here
  • Leak detection...
  • software PWM

Oscilloscopes Product Finder

Footer

EE World Online

EE WORLD ONLINE NETWORK

  • 5G Technology World
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer's Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire & Cable Tips

EE WORLD ONLINE

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Lee's teardown videos
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About Us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookConnect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube Add us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy