• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electrical Engineering News and Products

Electronics Engineering Resources, Articles, Forums, Tear Down Videos and Technical Electronics How-To's

  • Products / Components
    • Analog ICs
    • Connectors
    • Microcontrollers
    • Power Electronics
    • Sensors
    • Test and Measurement
    • Wire / Cable
  • Applications
    • Automotive/Transportation
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Medical
    • Telecommunications
    • Wearables
    • Wireless
  • Resources
    • DesignFast
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Week
    • Oscilloscope Product Finder
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
    • Women in Engineering
  • Videos
    • Teschler’s Teardown Videos
    • EE Videos and Interviews
  • Learning Center
    • EE Classrooms
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
      • Power Electronics & Programmable Power
    • FAQs
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • 5G

When audacious engineering leads to major success, Part 3: Apollo Mission profile

March 11, 2021 By Bill Schweber

The Mars Rover Sky Crane, SpaceX Self-Landing Booster, and the Apollo Lunar Lander are just a few examples of dramatic, radically unconventional thinking which led to astounding successes.

Time and distance have a way of blurring the hard edges, sharp points, and intense disputes which accompany innovation. Years later, what once seemed ridiculous or foolish is eventually thought of as an obvious, “of course, we knew it all along” idea. Now-routine rendezvous of spacecraft in orbit faced stiff opposition when proposed for the Apollo moon landing but eventually proved to be the only scenario that could work. The “disposable” mission profile and Lunar Module lander (Figure 3-1), was largely conceived and pushed single-handedly by John Houbolt, who passed away in 2014.

Fig 1: The final Apollo lunar landing mission profile required an Earth Orbit Rendezvous, a Lunar Orbit Rendezvous, and perhaps most innovative, a disposable, two-part Lunar Module to land on the moon’s surface and return the astronauts to the orbiting Command Module for the trip back to Earth. (Image: Wikipedia)

The original moon-landing plan was for the manned third-stage of the Earth launch rocket to “back down” to the moon’s surface, then take off and head back to Earth, just as in those movies of the 1950s such as the classic Destination Moon (Figure 3-2).

Fig 2: The “classic” concept of a moon landing showed a complete rocket (or stage) neatly “backed down” and parked on the surface, ready to blast off for the return trip to Earth. (Image: IMDB/Destination Moon)

His radical idea of a mission with a lunar orbit rendezvous (Figure 3-3), and leave-behind Lunar Module descent stage with separatable ascent-liftoff stage (Figure 3-4), faced intense opposition and even some derision, References 1 and 5.

Fig 3: John Houbolt pitched the details of the Lunar Orbit Rendezvous approach to anyone who would listen but was initially rebuffed, until the numbers and analysis showed the planned Earth Orbit Rendezvous approach wouldn’t work while his could. (Image: NASA)
Fig 4: The Lunar Module’s lower descent stage and upper ascent stage would be coupled for landing on the moon; the ascent stage would take the astronauts to the Command Module and then be abandoned in a decaying orbit and eventually crash into Moon, while the descent stage would be stay behind on the Moon’s surface. (Image: NASA)

However, he persisted and tried to convince everyone he could talk to (Figure 3), even circumventing channels by writing a sharp, career-endangering letter directly to the Apollo project head Robert Seamens (who was six org-chart layers above him!). He was absolutely certain that the conventional-wisdom of the three-stage approach was an unworkable dead end, while his alternative was viable, and he could prove it. This is not a “hearsay” story: his letter is in the NASA archives (Reference 7), and many reputable witnesses back up the broader story. He was not being a go-along, get-along team player, that’s for sure.

Houbolt did his own assessment of the assumed direct-to-Moon-and-back approach and said it just wouldn’t work when all of the weight, fuel, and risk issues were considered. He made a strong case for his alternative, but the NASA establishment made an equally good case, at least initially. Many engineers up and down the organizational chain were legitimately very skeptical. They criticized his ideas and figures, as they certainly should have been in a project of this magnitude and complexity.

In fairness to those who Houbolt did not initially persuade, it’s important to keep in mind that at the point in the Apollo project where he was making his case, just about everything about the fundamental design and specifics of the mission was somewhere between a very rough estimate and a fairly wild guess. There were thousands of technical unknowns from the basic rocket and capsule structure to propulsion, weight, and guidance issues. Everyone was stumbling around in the dark, so to speak, and there were serious and convincing counterarguments to his approach.

EE World Related Content

  1. Engineering the atomic submarine, Part 1: One man’s audacity, determination, dedication revolutionized naval reality
  2. Engineering the atomic submarine, Part 2: One man’s audacity, determination, dedication revolutionized naval reality
  3. The first undersea transatlantic cable: An audacious project that (eventually) succeeded, Part 1
  4. The first undersea transatlantic cable: An audacious project that (eventually) succeeded, Part 2
  5. The Ocean Liner S.S. United States: Part 1 – An audacious concept
  6. The Ocean Liner S.S. United States: Part 2 – A radical design
  7. The Ocean Liner S.S. United States: Part 3 – Rapid obsolescence
  8. The Ocean Liner SS United States: Part 4 – The cruise ship as successor

External References

  1. Murray Cox & Catherine Cox Bly, “Apollo: The Race to the Moon”
  2. “SpaceX Lands All 3 Falcon Heavy Boosters for the First Time” (video)
  3. “How SpaceX Lands Rockets with Astonishing Accuracy” (video)  (around 5:45 for schematic)
  4. SpaceX, “Falcon Heavy”
  5. NASA, “The Rendezvous That Was Almost Missed: Lunar Orbit Rendezvous and the Apollo Program”
  6. NASA, “Enchanted Rendezvous: The Lunar-Orbit Rendezvous Concept”
  7. Space Stack Exchange, “Text of John Houbolt’s letter proposing Lunar Orbit Rendezvous for Apollo?”
  8. MIT, Buzz Aldrin, “Line-Of-Sight Guidance Techniques For Manned Orbital Rendezvous“
  9. Buzz Aldrin, “Orbital Rendezvous“
  10. NASA, “John C. Houbolt, Unsung Hero of the Apollo Program, Dies at Age 95”
  11. Adam Steltzner and William Patrick “The Right Kind of Crazy: A True Story of Teamwork, Leadership, and High-Stakes Innovation”

You may also like:


  • When audacious engineering leads to major success, Part 4: Apollo…

  • When audacious engineering leads to major success, Part 2: Mars…

  • When audacious engineering leads to major success, Part 1: SpaceX…

  • The Ocean Liner S.S. United States: Part 1 – An…
  • undersea cable
    The first undersea transatlantic cable: An audacious project that (eventually)…

Filed Under: Aerospace & Defense, Applications, FAQ, Featured Tagged With: FAQ

Primary Sidebar

EE Training Center Classrooms.

EE Classrooms

Featured Resources

  • EE World Online Learning Center
  • RF Testing Basics
  • Power Supply Fundamentals
  • Women in Engineering
  • R&D 100 Podcast
Search Millions of Parts from Thousands of Suppliers.

Search Now!
design fast globle

R&D World Podcasts

R&D 100 Episode 8
See More >

Current Digital Issue

June 2022 Special Edition: Test & Measurement Handbook

A frequency you can count on There are few constants in life, but what few there are might include death, taxes, and a U.S. grid frequency that doesn’t vary by more than ±0.5 Hz. However, the certainty of the grid frequency is coming into question, thanks to the rising percentage of renewable energy sources that…

Digital Edition Back Issues

Sponsored Content

New Enterprise Solutions for 112 Gbps PAM4 Applications in Development from I-PEX

Positioning in 5G NR – A look at the technology and related test aspects

Radar, NFC, UV Sensors, and Weather Kits are Some of the New RAKwireless Products for IoT

5G Connectors: Enabling the global 5G vision

Control EMI with I-PEX ZenShield™ Connectors

Speed-up time-to-tapeout with the Aprisa digital place-and-route system and Solido Characterization Suite

More Sponsored Content >>

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Regarding Induction Heating From Low Voltage DC
  • [moved] Question to Forum moderators - When to start new thread
  • Help designing 1.6KW Isolated AC/DC with Constant Current Output
  • Variable Frequency and Amplitude Oscillator Circuit
  • Reducing switching noise in MOSFET inverter

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • Light Automation via mqtt
  • uc3843 Buck-boost
  • How to power up two stereo audio amplifiers from a single source of power supply
  • Nokia 5110 HW in Oshonsoft
  • Drill speed controller fault

Oscilloscopes Product Finder

Footer

EE World Online

EE WORLD ONLINE NETWORK

  • 5G Technology World
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer's Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire & Cable Tips

EE WORLD ONLINE

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Lee's teardown videos
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About Us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookConnect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube Add us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy