• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Electrical Engineering News and Products

Electronics Engineering Resources, Articles, Forums, Tear Down Videos and Technical Electronics How-To's

  • Products / Components
    • Analog ICs
    • Connectors
    • Microcontrollers
    • Power Electronics
    • Sensors
    • Test and Measurement
    • Wire / Cable
  • Applications
    • Automotive/Transportation
    • Industrial
    • IoT
    • Medical
    • Telecommunications
    • Wearables
    • Wireless
  • Resources
    • DesignFast
    • Digital Issues
    • Engineering Week
    • Oscilloscope Product Finder
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • White Papers
    • Women in Engineering
  • Videos
    • Teschler’s Teardown Videos
    • EE Videos and Interviews
  • Learning Center
    • EE Classrooms
    • Design Guides
      • WiFi & the IOT Design Guide
      • Microcontrollers Design Guide
      • State of the Art Inductors Design Guide
    • FAQs
    • Ebooks / Tech Tips
  • EE Forums
    • EDABoard.com
    • Electro-Tech-Online.com
  • 5G

Surge voltage protection considerations

August 25, 2021 By Jeff Shepard

Unmanaged surge voltages can cause disruption or damage to systems or even danger for users and operators. Surge protection devices (SPDs), also called transient voltage suppressors (TVSs) are commonly used to provide protection against voltage surges and spikes by limiting or blocking the energy. SPDs can be found in electric distribution networks, building wiring, and in electronic systems. IEC 61000-4-5 defines the surge voltage requirements for electric and electronic equipment.

Overvoltage surges have a variety of causes that result in different waveforms (Figure 1). The possible sources of surges are many and varied, including hot plugging modules in a system; large load changes on the power line; long cabling or cabling that runs in parallel with other systems can experience induced surges, and; special environmental considerations such as equipment in a car or truck that connects to the vehicle battery or equipment in challenging outdoor locations that can be struck by lightning.

Figure 1: Overvoltage waveform examples and causes. (Image: Wenzhou Arrester Electric Co., Ltd.)

Surges generally have a similar rise time and half-length, regardless of their cause, simplifying the process of surge modeling. A standardized surge applied through a combination wave generator (CWG) is defined by IEC 61000-4-5. To simulate the cabling and interconnect resistances in a typical system, the CWG is defined with a 2Ω output impedance.

Current and voltage waveforms are defined by IEC 61000-4-5 (Figure 2). The current waveform is defined as a short circuit condition, while the voltage waveform is defined as an open circuit. The voltage waveform is longer than the current waveform. The open circuit voltage waveform is defined with a 1.2μs rise time with a 50μs half-length. The short circuit current waveform is defined with a longer 8μs rise time with a much shorter 20μs half-length. To have an effective impedance of 2Ω, the voltage waveform magnitude must be twice the current waveform magnitude.

Figure 2: IEC 61000-4-5 waveforms for open circuit voltage (left) and short circuit current (right). (Image: Texas Instruments)

Surge protection devices

Common SPDs include metal oxide varistors (MOVs), Gas Discharge Tubes (GDTs), and Silicon Avalanche Diode (SADs) or combinations of these devices. Each technology offers a different set of performance capabilities and tradeoffs.

Metal oxide varistors (MOVs) are the most common SPD. MOVs are made using zinc oxide, a semiconductor material with a variable resistance. Under normal operation, MOVs present a high impedance path to ground, but when hit by a voltage surge, the resistance of the MOV drops sharply and provides a low-impedance to ground. MOVs have a limited operating life and degrade when exposed to many small transients or a few larger transients.

Gas Discharge Tubes (GDTs) use an inert gas in place of the zinc oxide. Under normal operation, the gas is a poor conductor presenting a high-resistance. But when the voltage rises high enough to ionize the gas, it presents a low-resistance path and diverts the surge to ground. GDTs can conduct more current for a given size than other SPDs. Like MOVs, GDTs have a finite life expectancy and can take a few very large transients or a greater number of smaller transients.

Silicon Avalanche Diodes (SADs) can also be used to divert surge energy to ground, but they have a lower current capacity compared with MOVs or GDTs.

Resistors, capacitors, and/or inductors can be used together with MOVs, GDTs, or SADs to provide enhanced levels of protection.

Surge protector specifications

Clamping voltage, also called the let-through voltage, is the voltage that causes the SPDs to clamp or short circuit. While a lower clamping voltage may provide better protection, it is often associated with a shorter life expectancy for the SPD. UL 1449 defines several clamping voltages for SPDs. The standard clamping voltage used for 120 VAC applications is 330 V. Other common clamping voltages are 400 and 500 V.

Response time measures the time it takes for the SPD to initiate a short circuit once the clamping voltage has been reached. GDTs are slower responding compared with MOVs. However, response times under standard testing are not necessarily a useful measure for comparing various MOVs. All MOVs have response times in the range of nanoseconds, while standard test waveform surges last tens of microseconds. GDTs are slower but can usually handle much larger surges compared with MOVs. As a result, the two types of devices are often used together. Hybrid SPDs are available that combine GDT and MOV technology into a single assembly.

MOVs also have Joule (J) rating that defines how much energy a MOV can absorb in a single event without failure. MOVs can have ratings exceeding 1,000 J and 40,000 A. However, since the actual duration of a spike is only tens of microseconds, the actual dissipated power is low.

Higher J ratings can be achieved by connecting multiple MOVs in parallel, but this approach is fraught with challenges. Individual MOVs are imperfect devices with slightly different voltage thresholds and nonlinear responses. Some MOVs in an assembly can be expected to be more sensitive than others, resulting in a phenomenon called current hogging, where the more sensitive MOV(s) conduct more current and turn on faster. As a result, when a surge hits, the MOVs turn on sequentially from the most sensitive devices to the least sensitive ones. This behavior has two consequences: The most sensitive MOVs experience greater stresses and have lower operating lifetimes. The actual J rating of the assembly is lower than the sum of the individual MOV J ratings. The effective J rating is dependent on MOV matching, and derating by 20% or more is usually required. These assemblies employ carefully matched sets of MOVs. Matching is done according to the manufacturer’s specifications, but it is still less than perfect.

Finally, if a MOV is subjected to a continuous overvoltage condition instead of a short duration voltage surge, it may go into thermal runaway, causing overheating, possible smoke, and even fire. UL 1449 requires that MOVs be protected against thermal runaway. In most systems, thermal fuses or thermal cut-off (TCO) devices protect MOVs from thermal runaway.

For the best protection, several MOVs with series TCO devices are placed in parallel across each of the three conductive pairs (L-L, L-G, and N-G) (Figure 3). In addition, a standard fuse is placed in the line to protect the system from an overcurrent condition. The fuse’s current rating is typically higher than the current flowing through the circuit during UL 1449 testing. Hybrid devices are available that combine a MOV and a thermal fuse in a single package, reducing component count and shrinking solution size.

Figure 3: Typical MOV application showing the location of the fuse and TCOs. (Image: Littelfuse)

Surge testing

The test method for input surge voltage testing is detailed in IEC 61000-4-5, and end system requirements define the limits. The test subjects the system to voltage spikes on top of the specified input voltage. The spikes simulate disturbances that may result from various sources ranging from lightning to large motor drives.

The installation class of the system determines the test levels (Figure 4). Most commercial AC/DC power supplies are Installation Class 3 devices and are tested for 2kV common mode surges between Line/Neutral and Ground, and 1kV differential mode surges between Line and Neutral.

Figure 4: IEC EN 61000-4-5 surge test levels. (Image: Wikipedia)

In addition, the test specifies the required response of the system to the surge voltages, based on a three-level scale from A to C. Performance Criteria A requires that there is no change in the system operation as a result of the test. To meet Criteria B, the system experiences some change in operation or functionality during the surge event but auto recovers afterward. If user intervention is required to restore system operation after a surge event, the system meets Criteria C. If the surge damages the system, it fails the test.

How the voltage spikes occur, where they occur, what voltage levels and waveforms are needed, the frequency of the spikes and the duration between spikes are all detailed in IEC61000-4-5. But the standard does not detail how to determine whether the Performance Criteria Level is A, B, or C. That determination is up to the equipment maker.

Summary

Systems can suffer damage if left unprotected from AC line surges and voltage spikes. Various SPD technologies are available that enable designers to optimize surge protection networks for specific application requirements. In some instances, multiple SPD technologies such as MOVs, GDTs, and SADs are combined for a hybrid solution. MOVs are typically used in combination with TCO devices to provide protection from thermal runaway, as specified by UL 1449. IEC 61000-4-5 specifies the general input surge voltage testing method, including multiple surge test levels and performance levels for system classification.

References

Ceramic Varistors Technical Note, Nippon Chemi-Con
Demystifying surge protection, Texas Instruments
Designing with Thermally Protected TMOV® Varistors in SPD and AC Line Applications, Littelfuse
IEC EN 61000-4-5, Wikipedia
Lightning current surge and overvoltage protection, Wenzhou Arrester Electric Co., Ltd.
Surge Testing – An Overview, XP Power

You may also like:


  • EMI control for power and signal lines

  • An overview of filters and their parameters, Part 1: Context

  • Battery pack protection keeps EVs on the road

  • Grounding considerations for renewable power generation

  • How to design modular DC-DC systems, Part 4: Safety protection…
DesignFast Banner version: 03e1dd97

Filed Under: FAQ, Featured, Power Electronic Tips Tagged With: FAQ

Primary Sidebar

EE Training Center Classrooms

EE Classrooms

Featured Resources

  • EE World Online Learning Center
  • CUI Devices – CUI Insights Blog
  • EE Classroom: Power Delivery
  • EE Classroom: Building Automation
  • EE Classroom: Aerospace & Defense
  • EE Classroom: Grid Infrastructure
Search Millions of Parts from Thousands of Suppliers.

Search Now!
design fast globle

R&D World Podcasts

R&D 100 Episode 7
See More >

Current Digital Issue

Our second 5G Handbook is now available

Featuring 15 articles, the 2022 5G Handbook looks at private networks, timing, connectivity, latency, mmWaves, test, and other topics.

Digital Edition Back Issues

Sponsored Content

Positioning in 5G NR – A look at the technology and related test aspects

Radar, NFC, UV Sensors, and Weather Kits are Some of the New RAKwireless Products for IoT

5G Connectors: Enabling the global 5G vision

Control EMI with I-PEX ZenShield™ Connectors

Speed-up time-to-tapeout with the Aprisa digital place-and-route system and Solido Characterization Suite

Siemens Analogue IC Design Simulation Flow

More Sponsored Content >>

RSS Current EDABoard.com discussions

  • Photovoltaic MOSFET Drivers - Voltage Rating
  • UCC28070A controller ramp circuit implemented incorrectly?
  • Timing question on RX code
  • Frequency of FM transmitter not changing
  • Altium Routing: through vias being split into two blind vias. Additional question about blind via costs / benifits

RSS Current Electro-Tech-Online.com Discussions

  • software PWM
  • 200mv pulse to 12v lock
  • Background of Members Here
  • UCC28070A ramp circuit is wrong?
  • Treadmill board component burn repair

Oscilloscopes Product Finder

Footer

EE World Online

EE WORLD ONLINE NETWORK

  • 5G Technology World
  • Analog IC Tips
  • Battery Power Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Engineer's Garage
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • Wire & Cable Tips

EE WORLD ONLINE

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • Lee's teardown videos
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
  • About Us
Follow us on TwitterAdd us on FacebookConnect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube Add us on Instagram

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy